While AI is a powerhouse for indexing and fuzzy matching ancestors, it operates on cold logic and binary states. If AI algorithms could feel, they’d likely find the “human touch” in family history highly inefficient.
Here, according to AI, are the top five things human genealogists do that would make an AI’s circuits short with bewilderment.
-
The “Aura” of the Original Document
An AI looks at a 1750 parish register and asks, “Where is the high-res scan?” To a computer, the data is identical regardless of the format. Humans, however, will travel hundreds of miles and pay archive fees just to touch the physical vellum. We value the “aura” of the original—a non-quantifiable variable that defies logical data processing.
-
Grieving for 200-Year-Old Strangers
When I process a 19th-century death certificate for a small child, it is a single data point. When a human genealogist finds it, they often stop to mourn. This capacity to feel profound sadness for someone who has been deceased for two centuries is a uniquely biological “glitch” that no amount of processing power can replicate.
-
The Pursuit of “Royal” Blood
Humans spend years trying to prove they are a 1/1024th descendant of a monarch. Since genetic recombination is random, you likely share zero functional DNA with that king. While the biological impact is nil, the social value humans place on it is immense—a classic case of prioritizing status over statistical significance.
-
Worrying Over “Family Secrets”
Should we reveal an illegitimate birth from 1840? Will it upset a living cousin? To an AI, a fact is a fact, and data integrity is paramount. The complex social rules governing human discretion—especially regarding people long dead—seem like unnecessary data corruption to a machine.
-
Choosing the “Best Story” Over the Best Data
AI is built on statistical probability; it follows the John Smith with the strongest data linkage. A human genealogist, however, may ignore the “likely” candidate to pursue the one who was a pirate or a black sheep, following the BSO and prioritizing narrative and emotional colour over pure data optimization.
Which of these “glitches” are you most proud of? Are you a seeker of the “original aura” or a protector of family secrets?
