About Scraping Trees

Following up on the post What was scraping trees in 1835? the 15 April 1865 issue of the New England Farmer offers an opinion, probably more than you care to know!

Scraping Trees. Yes, apple trees ; and what is it done for? We have asked the question many times of orchardists, and the reply uniformly is,  “Oh, it destroys the insects that shelter themselves under the bark, and hatch out their young there.”

“What other advantage is there in scraping fruit trees?”

“Well, it makes them smoother and look better.”

“These are the only reasons we have ever heard given for scraping apple trees. As to the first reason, the insects, we have now continued our pleasant labor over many trees, and although working with eyes wide open, have not seen a dozen insects, or their larvae, under the bark.

There is no doubt but insects of various kinds avail themselves of the shelter afforded by the, rough bark, both for their own comfort and as a place in which to produce their young, and if they had not this, would proceed to the moss on a stone wall or the bark on a rail fence, and reproduce themselves there, within a convenient distance of the orchard, if they chose to prey upon it. We do not, therefore, think much of this as a reason for scraping apple trees.
The other two are sound reasons; it does make them smoother and look better. We improve upon Nature by grafting, getting a fairer and more symmetrical tree, to say nothing of the fruit. Nature leaves the stem of the grafted tree in a very rough condition as it advances in age. Is this roughness the result of a mechanical operation, or is it especially designed as a protection to the tree, or is it both? Do the expanding forces of the tree gradually break the outer bark, causing it to scale off as it becomes dry, or is it a special provision of nature to protect the tree from atmospheric changes, heat and cold ?

As a fruit-bearer, is the tree in any way improved by scraping it? Does it grow either faster or more firmly for scraping, or will it produce a single apple more for such treatment? We cannot see that it will. But scraping greatly improves the appearance of the tree, giving the orchard a neat and finished condition that commends itself at once to all. This would not apply to forest and shade trees, as they are in a natural condition and cannot be improved by any art of man. After apple trees have been carefully scraped, if they are washed with common soft soap, diluted with rain water to the consistency of thin cream, they will assume a greenish hue that is pleasant to the eye and gives them much of the appearance they had when ten or a dozen years old. The scraping renders this operation easy, and the washing is decidedly beneficial to the tree. What is spilled upon the ground in washing is just what the tree likes, perhaps needs, and we are inclined to think that the foliage of a tree washed two or three times a year with soap and water, extending the wash well up the larger branches, will show a foliage larger, of a darker green and more vigorous growth than the same kind of trees that are not washed. What do you think, Orchardists? tell us, will you ?

On the same page, this:

WASH FOR TREES.

We have no great faith in the efficacy of either washing or scraping trees—but as some persons have, a few words on the subject may not be useless.

If washing is determined upon, the best material in our knowledge is common soft soap mixed with water until it is of the consistency of cream. It may be applied with a brush, or a swab. If applied in the month of July, it will have a tendency to destroy the eggs of insects which are then deposited on the bark, and about the roots of trees.

This wash will also be found effectual in removing moss and other parasitical productions. A sufficient amount of potash is contained in the soap to accomplish these ends, and yet not enough to injure the bark of the tree, and as it is of vegetable origin, it is more congenial to the tree than lime, and is always to be preferred. It does not close the pores of the bark, as lime wash does, but leaves them unobstructed and open to atmospheric influences, and in a state of vigorous and perfect health. It has long been used by orchardists and gardeners, and has never been known to injure any fruit tree, when made and applied as above directed.

A weak solution of potash might secure similar results, but its highly caustic nature makes its use quite dangerous.

These days, dormant oil spray, fungicides and insecticides are proposed. https://indianapolisorchard.com/home-apple-tree-care-spray-guide/. We’d likely be healthier if old-fashioned soft soap were used.

 

Findmypast Weekly Update

British Armed Forces, First World War Soldiers’ Medical Records
20,460 images and transcriptions were added. The whole collection has 1,378,307 results.

This collection comprises The National Archives’ series, MH106, War Office: First World War Representative Medical Records of Servicemen. Only a sample of the medical records was retained. Each result has an image and a transcript of the vital details. The transcript may include a combination of the following facts:

Name
Birth year
Service number
Rank
Corps
Admission date
Transfer date
Death year
Hospital
Country
Register type
Description
Series description
Record year range
Archive
Images

The images may provide additional details such as:

Number of years in service
Description of disease or wound
Religion
Other notes or observations

A search for Canad* returned 59,729, although not all were with the Canadian Forces. Some gave no name, but around 40 did include a service number.

Prisoners of War, 1715-1945
20,000 Second World War additions to search. 3,790,672 items are in the complete Prisoners Of War 1715-1945 collection.  Many entries, from various sources, only include surnames along with Residence, Year,  Service number, Birth place, Nationality, Rank, Rank as transcribed, Regiment as transcribed, Ship name, Prison camp or ship, Conflict, Archive reference, Document details,

A search for Canad* returns 64,550 items.

British Women’s Royal Naval Service Ratings’ Service Registers, 1918-1919
You can now discover additional age, next of kin, and image details for 6,894 previously available records. Each record includes a transcript from original material held at The National Archives in London in Series ADM 336. The amount of information varies; you should find: Name, Enrolment date, Service number, Rank or roll.

 

Commonwealth War Graves Commission Online Presentation

This Saturday, 16 November 2024, at 1 pm, tune in to an OGS Ottawa Branch presentation by David Loveridge, Director of Commonwealth War Graves Commission’s Canada, Americas, and Pacific Area.

David Loveridge will discuss the CWGC’s work maintaining the 1.7 million memorials and markers in Canada, the Americas, and the Pacific regions. Attendance is free.

Register in advance: https://us06web.zoom.us/meeting/register/tZYrf-yoqD4rEtPuTIXk0g5dtddC-O0NtP6b

MyHeritage adds Canada, Quebec Couples

This 39,513,800-item collection, new to MyHeritage and derived from the Drouin, has an interesting title. Records typically include the names of the groom and bride, their date and place of birth, date and place of baptism, date and place of marriage, and the names of their parents. Some records may also include the date and place of death and the place of burial.

Man Up!

Ancestry has added 19,715 records in the collection: Web: Isle Of Man, Wills Index, 1600-1864

A search returns Name. Will Date, Court House, Will Place and the Original URL.

The original data is Will Summaries. Isle of Man: Joyce M. Oates, at http://www.isle-of-man.com/manxnotebook/famhist/willsums/index.htm/. I’ve not linked it as Bitdefender blocks it as suspicious due to an expired security certificate.

What was scraping trees in 1835?

I’ve been looking at John Galbraith’s Diary from the Rural Diary Archive at U. Guelph.  He farmed in Oxford Country, Ontario. I asked Claude AI to summarize the activities month by month for 1835. The result:

January 1835:
Received visitors and attended church services
Chopped firewood
Tended to household and agricultural tasks

February 1835:
Chopped and gathered firewood
Attended church and community meetings

March 1835:
Tapped maple trees and made maple sugar/syrup
Did orchard work like scraping and pruning trees

April 1835:
Continued orchard work like pruning and scraping trees
Planted and tended crops

May 1835:
Pruned apple trees
Cut brush and did other orchard and farm maintenance

June 1835:
Pruned and washed apple trees
Worked on road maintenance
Visited with neighbors and attended church

July 1835:
Haying and harvesting crops
Scraping and pruning apple trees
Attended church and community events

August 1835:
Harvested apples and began drying/preserving them
Cleared brush and worked in the swamp
Attended agricultural exhibition

September 1835:
Apple harvesting, peeling, and preserving
Fenced the orchard
Attended church

October 1835:
Continued apple harvesting and cider making
Repaired fences
Attended church

November 1835:
Finished apple picking
Chopped and gathered firewood

December 1835:
Chopped firewood
Hosted a community wood-cutting “bee”
Attended church and visited neighbors

It’s interesting to see the annual cycle of farm tasks, but what was the “scraping trees” that occupied him in March, April and July?

According to Google, “Scraping trees” refers to the act of a deer, usually a male during mating season, rubbing its antlers against the bark of a tree, often to remove the velvet covering on the antlers, mark territory, or attract mates, which can damage the tree’s bark and sometimes even girdle the trunk if done excessively; essentially, it’s a behaviour where the deer “scrapes” its antlers on the tree by rubbing them against it.

I doubt Galbraith had antlers. If you know what he might have been doing or can speculate, please post a comment.

 

Ancestry New Subscriber Sale

Until 19 November 2024 at 11:59 p.m. ET, new subscribers can get a 6‑month membership for $50.99 for Canada Discovery Plus or $77.99 for World Deluxe, which is 40% off.

Read the fine print. “Excludes current subscribers. Your membership will automatically renew at the end of each 6‑month period and at that time your chosen method of payment will be charged $84.99 for Canada Discovery Plus or $129.99 for World Deluxe, plus applicable taxes, unless you are notified otherwise. If you don’t want to renew, cancel at least two days before your renewal date by logging into your account settings page or by contacting Ancestry.

If you want to continue subscribing at the full price, do nothing. If you want a better deal, cancel. Most people find they can get a better than full-price deal sooner rather than later.

 

New Managing Editor for BIFHSGO’s Anglo-Celtic Roots

BIFHSGO President Dianne Brydon has announced that Paul Cripwell has come forward to volunteer as the new managing editor of the society quarterly chronicle , Anglo-Celtic Roots 

He takes over from Barbara Tose, who will leave the position after the Winter issue in December.

Dianne expressed her appreciation to Barbara for her years working on the ACR and to Paul for stepping in to lead the dedicated team of editors and proofreaders. He will also look after layout.

Paul was born in England and came to Canada at an early age. He is retired from a senior position at NAV CANADA and is pursuing a study of the  Cripwell surname about which he has made two BIFHSGO presentations.

Thank You FamilySearch

From meticulously preserving and digitizing historical records to hosting in-person and online conferences and meetings to developing technologies that make family research more accessible than ever, FamilySearch has been a steadfast ally to genealogists.

Founded as the Genealogical Society of Utah in 1894, FamilySearch is celebrating its 130th Anniversary. This is an occasion to acknowledge their continuing commitment.

FamilySearch Celebrates 130 Years of Family Discovery

FamilySearch adds Canadian Content to Experimental Full-Text Search

Canada isn’t being ignored. An increase of 905 Canadian results since 6 November, now 22,500,069, is cause for optimism, if not celebration, that we may see more soon. FamilySearch doesn’t indicate which records have been added.  Here are the classifications now available.

By Collection
Canada, Homestead Records, 1600 – 2011 (8,064,701)
Canada, Probate Records, 1600 – 2020 (14,435,290)

By Province
Canada (14,359)
Alberta (2,673)
British Columbia (1,612,985)
Manitoba (781,062)
New Brunswick (361,862)
Newfoundland and Labrador (433,679)
Northwest Territories (2)
Nova Scotia (1,898,039)
Ontario (11,507,544)
Prince Edward Island (239,627)
Quebec (892,633)
Saskatchewan (4,755,606).

If you haven’t tried this experimental search, you do need a free FamilySearch account, I strongly recommend doing so. While preparing this post, I deviated from Canada and found new information about my Northwood family in Birmingham, England, in the 1820s.

 

 

This Week’s Online Genealogy Events

Choose from selected free online events in the next five days. All times are ET except as noted. Assume registration in advance is required; check so you’re not disappointed. Find out about many more, mainly US events, at Conference Keeper.

Tuesday, 12 November

2 pm: Ottawa Virtual Genealogy Drop-In. for OGS Ottawa Branch.
https://ottawa.ogs.on.ca/events/virtual-genealogy-drop-in-2-2024-11-12/

2 pm: Turn Your MyHeritage Record Matches into a Research Roadmap, by Lisa A. Alzo for Legacy Family Tree Webinars.
https://familytreewebinars.com/webinar/turn-your-myheritage-record-matches-into-a-research-roadmap/

2:30 pm: Digging for Gold in U.S Census Records, by Marcia Stewart for Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center.
https://acpl.libnet.info/event/12018257

7 pm: Winter of Discontent. by Jean Rae Baxter for OGS Lambton County Branch
https://lambton.ogs.on.ca/home/lambton-branch-monthly-meeting/

Wednesday, 13 November

7:15 pm: The Representation of the First World War in Film, by Cameron Telch for OGS York Region Branch.
https://york.ogs.on.ca/meetings-events/

7:30 pm: Sons of the Soil: Researching our British Agricultural Labouring Ancestors by Janet Few for the Lakeshire Genealogical Society (A Legacy Webinar)
Inquiries or Registration: LGSregister@gmail.com

8 pm: “Her Sixth Matrimonial Venture:” A Case Study on Tracing a Woman’s Multiple Marriages, by Sharon Hoyt for Legacy Family Tree Webinars.
https://familytreewebinars.com/webinar/her-sixth-matrimonial-venture-a-case-study-on-tracing-a-womans-multiple-marriages/

Thursday, 14 November

2:30 pm: The Mourning Brooch, by Jean Renwick for Cambridgeshire and Huntingdonshire FHS.
https://www.chfhs.org.uk/the-mourning-brooch-with-jean-renwick-448

6:30 pm: Murderer in the Family Tree — The Madness of John Terrell: Revenge and Insanity on Trial in the Heartland, by Stephen Terrell for Allen County Public Library Genealogy Center.
https://acpl.libnet.info/event/12018905

Friday, 15 November

2 pm:  Laws of the Indies: Spanish Colonial laws and the records they produced, by Judy G. Russell for Legacy Family Tree Webinars.
https://familytreewebinars.com/webinar/laws-of-the-indies-spanish-colonial-laws-and-the-records-they-produced/

7 pm: The Great War and the White Plague, by Eric Story for OGS Niagara Peninsula Branch.
https://niagara.ogs.on.ca/events-2/

Saturday 16 November

10 am: Travels with My Aunt: Adventures in Europe, 1914, by Barbara Tose for OGS Kingston Branch. 
https://kingston.ogs.on.ca/

1 pm: Commonwealth War Graves Commission, by David Loveridge for OGS Ottawa Branch.
https://ottawa.ogs.on.ca/events/commonwealth-war-graves-commission-ottawa/

1 pm: Great Moments and the 2024 Branch Report, for OGS Quinte Branch.
https://quinte.ogs.on.ca/great-moments-november-16-2024/

A Cross to Bear: Rethinking Religious Symbolism in Commonwealth War Graves

In Commonwealth War Graves Commission cemeteries worldwide, the Cross of Sacrifice stands as a towering presence, its white stone form reaching skyward in solemn remembrance of fallen servicemen and women. Designed by Sir Reginald Blomfield in 1918, this monument was conceived to honour the supreme sacrifice of those who gave their lives in service of the Commonwealth. Yet, as we approach this symbol today, we must ask: Does this Christian emblem represent all who made the ultimate sacrifice?

Consider Edward Cohen, a Jewish soldier whose final resting place may lie beneath a cross-marked headstone as an unknown soldier, his identity – and faith – lost to time. He represents countless others whose religious and cultural identities differ from the Christian symbolism that dominates these sacred spaces. Muslims, Hindus, Sikhs, Jews, atheists, and those of other faiths fought and died alongside their Christian comrades, their blood mingling in the same soil.

While meaningful to many, the Cross of Sacrifice perpetuates a default Christian stance that no longer, and never has, reflected the diverse tapestry of the Commonwealth’s military heritage. This is not about diminishing the significance of Christian sacrifice or erasing history—it’s about evolving our commemorative practices to honour all who served, regardless of their faith.

Through its Non-Commemoration Programme, the Commission has committed to ensuring that all who died in the world wars are remembered equally, regardless of where they were from, where they died, or how they died. This initiative shows that the CWGC can and will address historical inequities when recognized.

This same spirit of inclusion and equality should now extend to the Commission’s approach to religious symbolism. While the CWGC has long prided itself on equal treatment in death, regardless of rank, race, or religion – evident in the uniform headstones and meticulous maintenance of graves – the dominant Christian symbolism in these cemeteries suggests an implicit hierarchy of remembrance that contradicts this very principle.

A modern approach might involve creating new central monuments incorporating multiple faith traditions or abstract symbols of sacrifice and service. Some might argue that changing these historic sites risks diminishing their heritage value, but our war graves are not museum pieces – they are living memorials that should speak to all who visit them, regardless of faith.

The Commission already provides different religious symbols on individual headstones where faith is known. However, the default remains Christian for the unknown soldiers and in the broader symbolic landscape of these cemeteries. This practice requires reassessment in an era where we better understand and respect religious diversity.

Creating more inclusive memorial spaces doesn’t mean removing existing crosses, but rather supplementing them with new elements that acknowledge the multi-faith nature of service and sacrifice. This could involve adding complementary monuments or developing new designs for future cemeteries that better reflect the Commonwealth’s religious diversity.

As we continue to honour those who gave their lives in service, let us ensure our commemorative practices reflect the diversity of those who served. For Edward Cohen and countless others who lie in these hallowed grounds, we owe it to their memory to ensure that our monuments of remembrance speak for all who served. The greatest respect we can pay to our fallen is remembering them as they were – in all their diversity of belief and background, united in service and sacrifice.