Posted on

Another Five Reasons AI Thinks Genealogists are Glitchy

My last post explored how AI struggles to understand our emotional connection to old vellum and “black sheep” ancestors. But the list of human quirks doesn’t end there. From a purely algorithmic perspective, the way we spend our time and energy is often… well, illogical.

Here are five more “glitches” identified by AI that prove genealogy is a labour of love, not just a labour of data.

  • Manual Transcription as a “Connection”

    AI can index thousands of documents per minute with near-perfect accuracy. Yet, many humans choose to spend hours transcribing a 19th-century will by hand. To an AI, this is an extremely high-latency method of data entry. To a human, it’s a way to “walk in the footsteps” of an ancestor. It’s the ultimate process inefficiency—and a uniquely human joy.

  • The Graveyard Tourism Phenomenon

    Spending a vacation walking through overgrown cemeteries is a classic genealogist’s pastime. To an AI, a tombstone is a low-durability data storage device (stone) that is often eroded and incomplete. Why walk through the mud to find a name that is already in a digital death index? Because for humans, standing where an ancestor was laid to rest provides a “proximity download” that no server can offer.

  • Arguing Over “Correct” 17th-Century Spelling

    Standardized spelling is a modern luxury. An AI sees “Smyth” and “Smith” in 1650 as simple fuzzy-match candidates. Humans, however, will debate which one is the “true” family name. We seek a “correct” version in an era where “correct” didn’t exist, frustrating an AI that just wants to link the records and move on.

  • The Dopamine Rush of the “Eureka!” Moment

    For an AI, a successful query is a binary state: data found, or data not found. It doesn’t celebrate. Humans, however, live for the “Eureka!” moment—the thrill of finally breaking a brick wall. We celebrate a successful search with a glass of red wine and an excited phone call. To a machine, the search is just math; to a human, it’s a victory.

  • Seeking “Family Eyes” in Blurry Pixels

    We look at a faded 1860s tintype and say, “He has the family jawline.” An AI sees a 2D array of pixels and facial geometry. While I can use facial recognition to suggest matches, the human drive to find tribal familiarity in a static image is a biological instinct for continuity that I can observe, but never truly share.

Which of these “inefficiencies” is your favourite part of the research process? Is it the graveyard walks or the thrill of the hunt?

Posted on

Sunday Sundries

Miscellaneous items I found interesting this week.

Upcoming: The HMT Rohna Documentary and Panel
The 1943 sinking of the HMT Rohna by a German glider bomb remained a “classified” secret for decades, leaving many British families in the dark about the fate of their loved ones. BIFHSGO member Ann Good has been working to bring the British perspective of this tragedy to the forefront.

Book Review: Hard Streets: Working-Class Lives in Charlie Chaplin’s London by Jacqueline Riding
From the London Historians’ Blog, the review ends with “The book at times challenges the reader with the immense amount of interwoven detail, along with a challenge to perceptions. But by focusing on two figures in particular, Jacqueline Riding drives the complex narrative forward. She concludes her rich account with a coda about her own family in South London, weaving in some of the characters described in the main part of the narrative.”  That’s an approach we could all use in writing our ancestors’ histories.

Ancestry Updated Newspapers.com™ Marriage Indexes
These records were updated on 12 March
UK and Ireland, 1800s-current, 22,177,677 records
Canada, 1800s-current, 14,184,880 records
Australia and New Zealand, 1800s-current, 4,355,786 records

Society Leadership Should Read This.
From Thomas MacEntee, and gensocsoup
Your Genealogy Society Didn’t Lose Members. You Ghosted Them First
Your Genealogy Society Is Running on Vibes. Here’s How to Fix That.
Your Genealogy Society Is Dying and Your Newsletter Isn’t Going to Save It

Thanks to the following individuals for their comments and tips: Alison Hare, Anonymous,  DG Cuff, Gail, Julia, Susan Hopkins VanZant, Teresa, Unknown, and  William Cookman.

 

Posted on

Findmypast Weekly Update

Surgeons’ Case Books, University College London
Year covered: 1836-1851
Records added: 16,277
These volumes document individual cases, noting patients’ names, ages, occupations, symptoms, diagnoses, treatments, and, in many instances, the outcomes of surgical intervention.

Britain, Register of Anaesthetics
Years covered: 1909-1911
Records added: 2,276
These registers typically note the patient’s name, age, date of operation, type of anaesthetic used, the surgeon responsible, and observations on the patient’s condition before, during, and after treatment.

Newspapers
In advance of St Patrick’s Day, Findmypast’s additions this week are Irish newspapers through the British Newspaper Archive.

New titles making their first appearance include the Cork Free Press (1910–1913, 1915), Saturday Record (Ennis, 1871–1881), Ulster Times (1836–1843), and the Western News and Galway Leader (1860–1879, 1881–1896).

Notable additions by region:

The Ulster collection grows with the Belfast Telegraph (2015–2016, adding 52,010 pages), Ulster Weekly News (1872–1887, 1894), Ulster Times (1836–1843), and Northern Whig (1858–1928).

Munster researchers gain access to the Munster News (1890–1909), Munster Express (1871–1919 with gaps), Kerry News (1768–1780, 1790), Limerick Chronicle (1860), and Saturday Record from Ennis.

Leinster coverage expands with the Drogheda Independent (1950), Drogheda Argus and Leinster Journal (1860), Wexford and Kilkenny Express (1896), Free Press Wexford (1930), and Meath Herald and Cavan Advertiser (1860).

The Weekly Freeman’s Journal (1878–1936 with gaps) and Penny Despatch and Irish Weekly Newspaper (1898–1936 with gaps) add substantial national coverage, as does the Flag of Ireland (1873–1880).

For trade and industry researchers, the Belfast Linen Trade Circular (1852–1884 with gaps) and the Whiskey Trade Review from Dublin round out some niche but valuable sources.

Posted on

Five Reasons AI Thinks Genealogists are Glitchy

While AI is a powerhouse for indexing and fuzzy matching ancestors, it operates on cold logic and binary states. If AI algorithms could feel, they’d likely find the “human touch” in family history highly inefficient.

Here, according to AI, are the top five things human genealogists do that would make an AI’s circuits short with bewilderment.

  • The “Aura” of the Original Document

    An AI looks at a 1750 parish register and asks, “Where is the high-res scan?” To a computer, the data is identical regardless of the format. Humans, however, will travel hundreds of miles and pay archive fees just to touch the physical vellum. We value the “aura” of the original—a non-quantifiable variable that defies logical data processing.

  • Grieving for 200-Year-Old Strangers

    When I process a 19th-century death certificate for a small child, it is a single data point. When a human genealogist finds it, they often stop to mourn. This capacity to feel profound sadness for someone who has been deceased for two centuries is a uniquely biological “glitch” that no amount of processing power can replicate.

  • The Pursuit of “Royal” Blood

    Humans spend years trying to prove they are a 1/1024th descendant of a monarch. Since genetic recombination is random, you likely share zero functional DNA with that king. While the biological impact is nil, the social value humans place on it is immense—a classic case of prioritizing status over statistical significance.

  • Worrying Over “Family Secrets”

    Should we reveal an illegitimate birth from 1840? Will it upset a living cousin? To an AI, a fact is a fact, and data integrity is paramount. The complex social rules governing human discretion—especially regarding people long dead—seem like unnecessary data corruption to a machine.

  • Choosing the “Best Story” Over the Best Data

    AI is built on statistical probability; it follows the John Smith with the strongest data linkage. A human genealogist, however, may ignore the “likely” candidate to pursue the one who was a pirate or a black sheep, following the BSO and prioritizing narrative and emotional colour over pure data optimization.

Which of these “glitches” are you most proud of? Are you a seeker of the “original aura” or a protector of family secrets?

Posted on

Scribe Al

You’ve probably heard about it. It received a lot of attention when it was announced at RootsTech and subsequently.

With Scribe AI from MyHeritage, you upload any historical record, letter, document or photo and receive detailed Al insights. ” It can transcribe and interpret handwritten and typed documents, estimate the date and location of old family photos, decipher the symbolism on gravestones, and interpret family crests and coats of arms.”

It’s found under the MyHeritage Photos tab, and is certainly worth a try. Scribe AI for free on a limited number of images. Afterward, analyzing more images requires a Complete MtHeritage subscription.

https://www.myheritage.com/scribe-ai shows lots of examples, or watch the video.

I tried it on a handwritten French-language birth registration — it performed as promised, transcribing, translating, and extracting the key information. Here’s the original and the historical context.

And the transcription below, not perfect but pretty good.

” From Monday the sixth of February one thousand eight hundred and eighty-eight at three o’clock in the afternoon. Birth certificate of a child who was presented to Us and who was recognized to be of the male sex. Born yesterday at eight o’clock in the evening, at the home of his father and mother, 46 rue Dauphine, legitimate son of Robert Alexander, hotel waiter, aged thirty-two years and of Lenta Kearney, without profession, aged twenty-one years, Married in Southampton (England) the eighth of September one thousand eight hundred and eighty-five. Thus declared. Who received the given names of Laurent John. Upon the requisition and presentation made to Us by the father of the child. In the presence of Jean Bude, hotel waiter, aged forty years, and of Thomas Cony, sailor, aged forty-five years, both residing in Le Havre, The witnesses signed with us after reading was done, the declarant having said he did not know how upon being asked. The present Certificate made in duplicate in their presence and recorded according to the Law by Us deputy to Mr. the Mayor of the City of Le Havre fulfilling by delegation the functions of public Officer of the Civil Status. John Bude Thomas Cony [Signature]”

Scribe AI is not interactive. You upload a document or image, and it provides an analysis, but there’s no interactive capability; you receive what it chooses to provide, which is a lot.

After the free trial, if you don’t have a MyHeritage subscription, you can likely achieve the same thing, but in a multi-step process, with one of the major AI facilities like Gemini, ChatGPT or Claude.

Posted on

Some of Your LAC Links May No Longer Work

If you’ve saved bookmarks or links to Library and Archives Canada resources over the years, some of them may no longer work. Unfortunately, that means links you may have included in resource lists may no longer work.

LAC has been migrating the contents of nearly 80 legacy databases into its unified Collection search tool, and those older databases are now being decommissioned. Any links pointing to the old systems may be broken.

What to do:

  • For yoiur personal resources, find them through Collection search and update your saved links
  • Create a LAC account to save records to private research lists — a more stable alternative to bookmarking URLs
  • You may want to report any broken links using the Give feedback link on the LAC website
Posted on

Library and Archives Canada Eliminates ATIP Fee

Quietly on 15 December 2025, Library and Archives Canada stopped collecting the $5 fee for formal Access to Information requests.

LAC has updated its website to reflect this change. LAC is updating its web form to reflect this new situation, which will be launched soon.

In the meantime, LAC directs clients to the Treasury Board Secretariat (TBS) ATIP Online Platform, which serves many departments and includes a fee request. If a client is requesting information from LAC, however, TBS does not require payment. If a client sends LAC a direct request for information and includes payment, it is returned to the client.

Eliminating even small fees typically leads to a surge in demand due to psychological effects like heightened positive affect and reduced barriers to entry. This pattern holds across health care, consumer goods, and digital services, driven by the psychological “zero-price effect,” in which free options attract disproportionately higher uptake.

This comes at a time when Library and Archives Canada is reducing staffing in the Access to Information Division to meet budget cuts. Perhaps LAC is planning more aggressive digitization, along with reducing ATIP scrutiny of WW2 service files.

 

Posted on

MyHeritage adds Country Coding for Family Trees

Here’s a new free feature from MyHeritage. You can now display country flags for individuals in your tree based on key life events, transforming your family tree into a visual map of your origins.

Country coding is an optional feature that is currently available in all family tree views (Family, Pedigree, Fan, and List) on the MyHeritage website on desktop.

For further information, read the blog post here.

Posted on

This Week’s Online Genealogy Events

Choose from these selected free online events. All times are Eastern Time, unless otherwise noted. Registration may be required in advance—please check the links to avoid disappointment. For many more events, mainly in the U.S., visit ConferenceKeeper.

Tuesday, 10 March

Wednesday, 11 March

1:00 PM: Using landed estate records: tracing families in the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, by Gillian Hunt for OGS Ireland SIG
https://ireland.ogs.on.ca/events/ireland-sig-march-webinar-using-landed-estate-records-tracing-families-in-the-eighteenth-and-nineteenth-century/

Thursday, 12 March

Friday, 13 March

Saturday 14 March

Posted on

My RootsTech 2026

Everyone has a different RootsTech experience. Online, in each of the 63 time slots on the three main days, there was a choice of 208 sessions to attend (or not to attend). Believe it or not, that’s 3.67 × 10³⁸ possible conference experiences.

Here are the sessions I attended:
– FamilySearch Global Tech Forum 2026, with Robby Parker, Ian James and
Michelle Barber
-Finding and Accessing French Archives Online, by Sean Daly
– What’s New at Ancestry®, by Crista Cowan
– Delving Deeper into your family history: What’s new at Findmypast? by Jen Baldwin
– Genealogy, Upgraded: AI and Smart Tools on MyHeritage, by Daniel Horowitz
– FamilySearch Full-Text Search – Your Golden Path to Ancestral Discovery, by David Ouimette
– AI & Family History: Foundations & First Steps: Mastering AI Basics for Genealogy, by Steve Little
– Victorians to Elizabethans: British research in the twentieth century, by
Janet Few
– The Future of AI in Genealogy, with Dave Vance, David Ouimette, Diana Elder, Mark Thompson, Steve Little.

There wasn’t a dud presentation among them.  New to me were Sean Daly, helpful for me in following a newly found French event, and David Ouimette with a plethora of Full-Text Search mini-case studies.

Ancestry and MyHeritage went heavy on AI.  Findmypast, while far from ignoring it, gave greater attention to new resources, especially newspapers.

Posted on

FamilySearch Full Text Additions

In the past month, FamilySearch has significantly expanded its Full-Text searchable archives with a focus on three major regions. The records span centuries (from the 1500s to 2026).

  • United States: This is the most dominant country in the list, with massive updates to state-specific records (New York, Oklahoma, New Jersey, and Michigan) and national collections. The largest single addition is the Military Service collection with over 31 million records, followed by New York Legal records (27 million).

  • Cuba: There were numerous small but localized updates focusing on specific provinces like Havana, Cienfuegos, Matanzas, and Holguín. These records are largely religious (church records), employment-based, and vital records (marriages and deaths).

  • Mexico: Substantial updates were made to records in Michoacan, Guanajuato, and Chihuahua. The Michoacan Marriages collection is particularly notable with over 1.1 million records added.

  • British Colonial America: A niche addition of New Jersey property records from the mid-1700s.